by Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Elie Guichard, Jean Reignier,
Amélie Le Gouge, Caroline Pouplet, Stéphanie Martin, Jean-Claude Lacherade and
Gwenhael Colin
Critical Care volume 25,
Article number: 434 (2021) Published: 17
December 2021
Purpose
While targeted temperature management (TTM) has been
recommended in patients with shockable cardiac arrest (CA) and suggested in
patients with non-shockable rhythms, few data exist regarding the impact of the
rewarming rate on systemic inflammation. We compared serum levels of the
proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL6) measured with two rewarming rates
after TTM at 33 °C in patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest (OHCA).
Methods
ISOCRATE was a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing
rewarming at 0.50 °C/h versus 0.25 °C/h in patients coma after
shockable OHCA in 2016–2020. The primary outcome was serum IL6 level
24–48 h after reaching 33 °C. Secondary outcomes included the day-90
Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) and the 48-h serum neurofilament
light-chain (NF-L) level.
Results
We randomized 50 patients. The median IL6
area-under-the-curve was similar between the two groups (12,389 [7256–37,200]
vs. 8859 [6825–18,088] pg/mL h; P = 0.55). No significant difference was
noted in proportions of patients with favorable day-90 CPC scores (13/25
patients at 0.25 °C/h (52.0%; 95% CI 31.3–72.2%) and 13/25 patients at
0.50 °C/h (52.0%; 95% CI 31.3–72.2%; P = 0.99)). Median NF-L levels
were not significantly different between the 0.25 °C/h and 0.50 °C/h
groups (76.0 pg mL, [25.5–3074.0] vs. 192 pg mL,
[33.6–4199.0]; P = 0.43; respectively).
Conclusion
In our RCT, rewarming from 33 °C at 0.25 °C/h,
compared to 0.50 °C/h, did not decrease the serum IL6 level after
shockable CA. Further RCTs are needed to better define the optimal TTM strategy
for patients with CA.
Take-Home Message: Rewarming at a rate of
0.25 °C/h, compared to 0.50 °C, did not result in lower serum IL6
levels after achievement of hypothermia at 33 °C in patients who remained
comatose after shockable cardiac arrest. No associations were found between the
slower rewarming rate and day-90 functional outcomes or mortality.
140-character Tweet: Rewarming at 0.25 °C
versus 0.50 °C did not decrease serum IL6 levels after hypothermia at
33 °C in patients comatose after shockable cardiac arrest.
No comments:
Post a Comment