by Filippo Albani, Federica Fusina, Gianni Ciabatti, Luigi
Pisani, Valeria Lippolis, Maria Elena Franceschetti, Alessia Giovannini,
Rossella di Mussi, Francesco Murgolo, Antonio Rosano, Salvatore Grasso and
Giuseppe Natalini
Critical Care volume 25,
Article number: 427 (2021) Published: 15
December 2021
Background
Flow Index, a numerical expression of the shape of the inspiratory
flow-time waveform recorded during pressure support ventilation, is associated
with patient inspiratory effort. The aim of this study was to assess the
accuracy of Flow Index in detecting high or low inspiratory effort during
pressure support ventilation and to establish cutoff values for the Flow index
to identify these conditions. The secondary aim was to compare the performance
of Flow index,of breathing pattern parameters and of airway occlusion pressure
(P0.1) in detecting high or low inspiratory effort during pressure support
ventilation.
Methods
Data from 24 subjects was included in the analysis,
accounting for a total of 702 breaths. Breaths with high inspiratory effort
were defined by a pressure developed by inspiratory muscles (Pmusc) greater
than 10 cmH2O while breaths with low inspiratory effort were defined by a Pmusc lower
than 5 cmH2O. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of
Flow Index and respiratory rate, tidal volume,respiratory rate over tidal
volume and P0.1 were analyzed and compared to identify breaths with
low or high inspiratory effort.
Results
Pmusc, P0.1, Pressure Time Product and Flow Index
differed between breaths with high, low and intermediate inspiratory effort,
while RR, RR/VT and VT/kg of IBW did not differ in a statistically
significant way. A Flow index higher than 4.5 identified breaths with high
inspiratory effort [AUC 0.89 (CI 95% 0.85–0.93)], a Flow Index lower than 2.6
identified breaths with low inspiratory effort [AUC 0.80 (CI 95% 0.76–0.83)].
Conclusions
Flow Index is accurate in detecting high and low spontaneous
inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation.
No comments:
Post a Comment