Temperature control in acute brain injury

Intensive Care Medicine: Published 20 April 2026

Purpose

Temperature is a key determinant of cerebral vulnerability after acute brain injury and a physiological variable that can be continuously monitored and actively controlled in the intensive care unit. Its therapeutic role has evolved from hypothermia-centred strategies toward early recognition of fever and controlled normothermia. This review examines the physiological rationale, clinical evidence, and contemporary practice of temperature management in neurocritical care.

Methods

We synthesised evidence from major randomised trials, observational studies, and international consensus recommendations across traumatic brain injury, acute vascular brain injury, and post-cardiac arrest encephalopathy, together with current monitoring and implementation approaches.

Results

Fever is consistently associated with worse neurological outcomes. In traumatic brain injury, hypothermia reduces intracranial pressure but does not improve functional outcome when used prophylactically and is reserved for refractory intracranial hypertension. In acute vascular brain injury, neutral trials and feasibility constraints have shifted practice toward early detection and treatment of fever rather than hypothermia. In post-cardiac arrest care, contemporary guidelines recommend protocolised temperature control with selection and maintenance of a constant target between 32°C and 37.5°C and active prevention of fever, rather than mandatory hypothermia.

Conclusions

Temperature control is a fundamental component of care aimed at protecting the injured brain through continuous monitoring, early detection of fever, and prevention of temperature-related harm.

 

Critical Care Bulletin: January 2026

 

Spontaneous breathing trials as predictors of extubation outcomes in neurocritical care: insights from the ENIO study

Intensive Care Medicine | Published: 13 January 2026

 

 

Purpose

In critically ill patients, extubation readiness is typically assessed using a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Among patients with acute brain injury (ABI), the optimal SBT method remains uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the ENIO study (NCT03400904), including mechanically ventilated ABI patients with available SBT data, undergoing extubation attempt. SBTs were classified as T-piece, pressure support ventilation (PSV), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The primary outcome was extubation failure within 5 days. Associations between SBT modality and extubation failure were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results

Of 1,512 patients enrolled in ENIO, 839 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 270 (32.2%) were female and 396 (47.2%) had traumatic brain injury as the cause of admission. SBTs were performed with PSV in 430 (51.3%), T-piece in 329 (39.2%), and CPAP in 80 (9.5%). SBT median duration was 60 min in PSV and T-piece, while 120 min in CPAP. Extubation failure occurred in 177 (21.1%) cases. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between SBT modality or duration and extubation outcome. Results were similar in ABI subgroup analyses. After inverse probability weighting, vigorous cough remained the only significant predictor of extubation success.

Conclusions

In this large international ABI cohort, neither SBT mode nor duration was associated with extubation failure.

 

 

 

 

Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable

Intensive Care Medicine | Published: 15 December 2025

Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DoC) represent a spectrum of clinical conditions, including coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, and the minimally conscious state, which may result from structural and non-structural brain injuries due to trauma, stroke, anoxia, infections of the brain, and other causes. Clinical management of patients with DoC is especially challenging in the critical care environment, where the level of consciousness, a key factor in determining the trajectory of recovery, may be obscured by sedation, analgesia, and other confounders. The 2025 International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine hosted a Roundtable of 18 expert clinicians and researchers to synthesise and discuss the latest evidence on acute DoC epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Here, we summarise the output of the Roundtable in the format of a roadmap with six steps related to identifying patients with DoC, assessing for and treating confounders, establishing a diagnosis and prognosis, selecting interventions, and effectively communicating with family. This roadmap provides practical, evidence-informed guidance to help intensivists navigate diagnosis, treatment, and prognostication in patients with acute DoC. Advances in structural and functional neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and blood-based biomarkers offer promise for refined diagnostics and prognostication, though their clinical translation remains limited.

 

Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis

 

by Karim Asehnoune, Paul Rooze, Chiara Robba, Marwan Bouras, Luciana Mascia, Raphaël Cinotti, Paolo Pelosi and Antoine Roquilly 

 

Critical Care volume 27, Article number: 221 Published: 06 June 2023

 

Objective

To describe the potential effects of ventilatory strategies on the outcome of acute brain-injured patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.

Design

Systematic review with an individual data meta-analysis.

Setting

Observational and interventional (before/after) studies published up to August 22nd, 2022, were considered for inclusion. We investigated the effects of low tidal volume Vt < 8 ml/Kg of IBW versus Vt >  = 8 ml/Kg of IBW, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) < or >  = 5 cmH2O and protective ventilation (association of both) on relevant clinical outcomes.

Population

Patients with acute brain injury (trauma or haemorrhagic stroke) with invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 24 h.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was mortality at 28 days or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the duration of mechanical ventilation and the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio.

Results

The meta-analysis included eight studies with a total of 5639 patients. There was no difference in mortality between low and high tidal volume [Odds Ratio, OR 0.88 (95%Confidence Interval, CI 0.74 to 1.05), p = 0.16, I2 = 20%], low and moderate to high PEEP [OR 0.8 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.07), p = 0.13, I2 = 80%] or protective and non-protective ventilation [OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.15), p = 0.6, I2 = 11]. Low tidal volume [OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.21, p = 0.23, I2 = 88%], moderate PEEP [OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.26), p = 0.9, I2 = 21%] or protective ventilation [OR 1.22 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.58), p = 0.13, I2 = 22%] did not affect the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation improved the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the first five days of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Low tidal volume, moderate to high PEEP, or protective ventilation were not associated with mortality and lower incidence of ARDS in patients with acute brain injury undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. However, protective ventilation improved oxygenation and could be safely considered in this setting. The exact role of ventilatory management on the outcome of patients with a severe brain injury needs to be more accurately delineated.