Association between controlled mechanical ventilation and systemic inflammation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: an observational cohort study

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 482 (2025) Published: 11 November 2025

Background

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, spontaneous breathing efforts may contribute to patient self-inflicted lung injury through increased ventilation inhomogeneity and systemic inflammation. Whether early transition to controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) mitigates these effects remains uncertain.

Methods

This observational, prospective cohort study included 40 ICU patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who initially breathed spontaneously. Based on clinical decisions, patients were managed with either continued spontaneous breathing (SB group, n = 12) or transitioned to CMV (CMV group, n = 28). Arterial blood gases, hemodynamics, plasma cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8), and ventilation distribution via electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were recorded at baseline and after 24 h. In the CMV group, intermediate time points (T2, T6, T12) were also assessed after intubation. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03513809).

Results

In the CMV group, respiratory rate and heart rate decreased significantly over time. IL-6 levels dropped markedly from 305 ± 938 pg/mL at baseline to 27 ± 58 pg/mL at 24 h (p = 0.0195), accompanied by a significant improvement in oxygenation (PaO₂/FiO₂ from 140 ± 51 to 199 ± 67, p = 0.0004). EIT data showed improved ventilation distribution with increased end-expiratory lung impedance, decreased global inhomogeneity, and a shift in the center of ventilation toward dorsal regions. In contrast, the SB group showed no significant changes over 24 h in gas exchange, systemic inflammation, or EIT-derived parameters.

Conclusions

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure initially breathing spontaneously, transition to CMV was associated with reduced IL-6 levels and improved ventilatory homogeneity over 24 h. These exploratory findings indicate that connection to controlled mechanical ventilation was associated with reduced systemic inflammation, a relationship that warrants confirmation in larger prospective studies.

 

 

Assessing inspiratory drive and effort in critically ill patients at the bedside

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 339, Published: 31 July 2025

Abstract

Monitoring inspiratory drive and effort may aid proper selection and setting of respiratory support in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), whether they are intubated or not. Although diaphragmatic electrical activity (EAdi) and esophageal manometry can be considered the reference methods for assessing respiratory drive and inspiratory effort, respectively, various alternative techniques exist, each with distinct advantages and limitations. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of bedside methods to assess respiratory drive and effort, with a primary focus on patients with ARF. First, EAdi and esophageal manometry are described and discussed as reference techniques. Then, alternative methods are categorized along the neuromechanical pathway from inspiratory drive to muscular effort into three groups: (1) techniques assessing the respiratory drive: airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), mean inspiratory flow (Vt/Ti) and respiratory muscle surface electromyography (sEMG); (2) techniques assessing the respiratory muscle effort: whole-breath occlusion pressure (ΔPocc), pressure-muscle index (PMI), nasal pressure swing (ΔPnose), diaphragm ultrasonography (USdi), central venous pressure swing (ΔCVP), breathing effort (BREF) models, and flow index; (3) techniques and clinical parameters assessing the consequences of effort: tidal volume (Vt), electrical impedance tomography (EIT), dyspnea. For each, we summarize the physiological rationale, measurement methodology, interpretation of results, and key limitations.