Sex disparities in ICU care and outcomes after cardiac arrest: a Swiss nationwide analysis

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 42 (2025) 

Published: 23 January 2025

Background

Conflicting data exist regarding sex-specific outcomes after cardiac arrest. This study investigates sex disparities in the provision of critical care and outcomes of in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.

Methods

Analysis of adult cardiac arrest patients admitted to certified Swiss intensive care units (ICUs) (01/2008–12/2022) using the nationwide prospective ICU registry. The primary outcome was ICU mortality, with secondary outcomes including ICU admission probability and advanced treatment provision.

Results

Among 41,733 individuals (34.9% women), 21,692 patients (30.6% women) were admitted to ICUs (16,571 OHCA patients/5121 IHCA patients). Women were less likely to be admitted to the ICU than men (incidence rate ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.80–0.85] and had a higher ICU mortality (41.8% vs 36.2%; p < 0.001). Mortality differences were more pronounced in OHCA patients (unadjusted HR: 1.35 [95% CI 1.28–1.43]; adjusted HR: 1.19 [95% CI 1.12–1.25]). In IHCA patients, mortality differences were less pronounced (unadjusted HR: 1.14 [95% CI 1.04–1.25]) and vanished after adjustment for confounders: adjusted HR: 1.03 [95% CI 0.94–1.13]). Women after cardiac arrest were older, more severely ill, and received fewer interventions before (44.7% vs 54.0%; p < 0.001) and during ICU stay. A subgroup analysis of 11,202 patients revealed that treatment limitations were more frequent in women (46.7% vs 38.7%; p < 0.001). However, these limitations were associated with an increased risk of death in both sexes.

Conclusions

This study highlights sex disparities in short-term mortality and ICU resource allocation among cardiac arrest patients, with women potentially facing disadvantages, in particular after OHCA. The limitations of ICU registry data, particularly the lack of detailed cardiac arrest-specific and comorbidity information, restrict definitive conclusions. Future research should prioritize prospective studies with more granular data to better understand and address these disparities.

 

Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine

 

Intensive Care Medicine: Narrative Review: Published: 07 September 2023

 

 

Abstract

Despite significant advancements in critical care medicine, limited attention has been given to sex and gender disparities in management and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). While “sex” pertains to biological and physiological characteristics, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes and sex hormones, “gender” refers more to sociocultural roles and human behavior. Unfortunately, data on gender-related topics in the ICU are lacking. Consequently, data on sex and gender-related differences in admission to the ICU, clinical course, length of stay, mortality, and post-ICU burdens, are often inconsistent. Moreover, when examining specific diagnoses in the ICU, variations can be observed in epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, severity, and treatment response due to the distinct impact of sex hormones on the immune and cardiovascular systems. In this narrative review, we highlight the influence of sex and gender on the clinical course, management, and outcomes of the most encountered intensive care conditions, in addition to the potential co-existence of unconscious biases which may also impact critical illness. Diagnoses with a known sex predilection will be discussed within the context of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where clinical improvement is needed. To optimize patient care and outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend and address sex and gender differences in the ICU setting and personalize management accordingly to ensure equitable, patient-centered care. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving sex and gender disparities, as well as exploring targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities and improve outcomes for all critically ill patients.