Use of a molecular syndromic panel for the etiological diagnosis of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: impact on clinical outcomes and antibiotic use from a multicenter, prospective study

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 403 (2025) Published: 25 September 2025

Background

Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) is a common infection in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU), with attributable mortality of up to 13%, and its etiological diagnosis remains challenging.

Materials and methods

We conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study within the MULTI-SITA platform to assess the impact on relevant clinical and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes of the use of a molecular syndromic panel (BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus), in addition to a standard approach based on culture. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality from VABP onset.

Results

Overall, 237 patients with VABP were included in the study. In multivariable analysis, SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.22, p = 0.003), previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.25–7.32, p = 0.015), and solid neoplasm (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.12–4.14, p = 0.022) were associated with increased mortality, while no association was registered for the molecular syndromic panel performed (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.59–1.93, p = 0.825). In secondary analyses, use of the molecular syndromic panel resulted in more events of either de-escalation or initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy at day 1 from VABP onset in comparison with a standard approach based on culture only (41.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.041).

Conclusion

The use of a molecular syndromic panel in patients with VABP was able to impact antibiotic decisions, without an unfavorable effect on mortality. Further study is necessary to assess the long-term effects in terms of antimicrobial stewardship of molecular syndromic panels-based antibiotic treatment decisions.

 

Oral care for intubated patients in the intensive care unit: examination of bacterial count and microbiota

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 320, Published: 23 July 2025

Abstract

Background

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) after tracheal intubation is a major infectious complication in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), with an incidence of 8–28%. Oral care in the ICU is essential; however, the presence of an intubation tube and restricted mouth opening cause complications. A healthy commensal microflora in the oral cavity resists colonization by respiratory pathogens, and poor oral hygiene may increase the risk for VAP. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of oral care on oral bacterial counts and microbial diversity in patients admitted to the ICU.

Methods

Fifteen ICU patients were included in this study. Oral microbiome samples were collected by swabbing the surface of the tongue. Oral bacterial counts were measured at four time points: before and after oral care, both pre- and post-extubation. Additionally, microbiome analysis was conducted twice: once before oral care pre-extubation, and once before oral care post-extubation. Oral bacterial counts were assessed using a bacterial counter, and microbiome analysis was performed through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

Results

Oral bacterial counts significantly decreased after oral care at both pre- and post-extubation time points. Microbiome analysis revealed significant differences in alpha diversity pre- and post-extubation samples. Samples post extubation were less diverse.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that oral care effectively reduces bacterial counts in ICU patients, both pre- and post-extubation. Microbiome analysis revealed shifts in microbial diversity, suggesting that the oral microbiota was disrupted during intubation. Given the risk of VAP, oral care may play an important role to prevent VAP in ICU settings.

 

Efficacy and safety of antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria in nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

 by David Luque Paz, Dara Chean, Pierre Tattevin, Damien Luque Paz, Betsega Assefa Bayeh, Achille Kouatchet, Delphine Douillet and Jérémie Riou

 Annals of Intensive Care volume 14, Article number: 66, Published: 25 April 2024

Background

Multiple randomized controlled studies have compared numerous antibiotic regimens, including new, recently commercialized antibiotics in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP). The objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different antibiotic treatments for NP.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases from 2000 through 2021. The study selection included studies comparing antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli in the setting of NP. The primary endpoint was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure and adverse events.

Results

Sixteen studies encompassing 4993 patients were included in this analysis comparing 13 antibiotic regimens. The level of evidence for mortality comparisons ranged from very low to moderate. No significant difference in 28 day mortality was found among all beta-lactam regimens. Only the combination of meropenem plus aerosolized colistin was associated with a significant decrease of mortality compared to using intravenous colistin alone (OR = 0.43; 95% credible interval [0.17–0.94]), based on the results of the smallest trial included. The clinical failure rate of ceftazidime was higher than meropenem with (OR = 1.97; 95% CrI [1.19–3.45]) or without aerosolized colistin (OR = 1.40; 95% CrI [1.00–2.01]), imipemen/cilastatin/relebactam (OR = 1.74; 95% CrI [1.03–2.90]) and ceftazidime/avibactam (OR = 1.48; 95% CrI [1.02–2.20]). For microbiological cure, no substantial difference between regimens was found, but ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest probability of being superior to comparators. In safety analyses, there was no significant difference between treatments for the occurrence of adverse events, but acute kidney failure was more common in patients receiving intravenous colistin.

Conclusions

This network meta-analysis suggests that most antibiotic regimens, including new combinations and cefiderocol, have similar efficacy and safety in treating susceptible Gram-negative bacilli in NP. Further studies are necessary for NP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Registration PROSPERO CRD42021226603

 

Immediate vs. culture-initiated antibiotic therapy in suspected non-severe ventilator-associated pneumonia: a before–after study (DELAVAP)

 

by Maëlle Martin, Solène Forveille, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Amélie Seguin, Emmanuel Canet, Jérémie Lemarié, Maïté Agbakou, Luc Desmedt, Gauthier Blonz, Olivier Zambon, Stéphane Corvec, Aurélie Le Thuaut and Jean Reignier

 

Annals of Intensive Care volume 14, Article number: 33 (2024) Published: 27 February 2024

 

Background

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the leading nosocomial infection in critical care and is associated with adverse outcomes. When VAP is suspected, starting antibiotic therapy (AT) immediately after pulmonary sampling may expose uninfected patients to unnecessary treatment, whereas waiting for bacteriological confirmation may delay AT in infected patients. As no robust data exist to choose between these strategies, the decision must balance the pre-test diagnostic probability, clinical severity, and risk of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study in patients with suspected non-severe VAP was to compare immediate AT started after sampling to conservative AT upon receipt of positive microbiological results. The outcomes were antibiotic sparing, AT suitability, and patient outcomes.

Methods

This single-center, before–after study included consecutive patients who underwent distal respiratory sampling for a first suspected non-severe VAP episode (no shock requiring vasopressor therapy or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome). AT was started immediately after sampling in 2019 and upon culture positivity in 2022 (conservative strategy). The primary outcome was the number of days alive without AT by day 28. The secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation duration, day-28 mortality, and AT suitability (active necessary AT or spared AT).

Results

The immediate and conservative strategies were applied in 44 and 43 patients, respectively. Conservative and immediate AT were associated with similar days alive without AT (median [interquartile range], 18.0 [0–21.0] vs. 16.0 [0–20.0], p = 0.50) and without broad-spectrum AT (p = 0.53) by day 28. AT was more often suitable in the conservative group (88.4% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.01), in which 27.9% of patients received no AT at all. No significant differences were found for mechanical ventilation duration (median [95%CI], 9.0 [6–19] vs. 9.0 [6–24] days, p = 0.65) or day-28 mortality (hazard ratio [95%CI], 0.85 [0.4–2.0], p = 0.71).

Conclusion

In patients with suspected non-severe VAP, waiting for microbiological confirmation was not associated with antibiotic sparing, compared to immediate AT. This result may be ascribable to low statistical power. AT suitability was better with the conservative strategy. None of the safety outcomes differed between groups. These findings would seem to allow a large, randomized trial comparing immediate and conservative AT strategies.

 

Effectiveness of Continuous Cuff Pressure Control in Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials*

 

by Maertens, Bert; Lin, Frances; Chen, Yingyan; Rello, Jordi; Lathyris, Dimitrios; Blot, Stijn

 

Critical Care Medicine: October 2022 - Volume 50 - Issue 10 - p 1430-1439

 

OBJECTIVES: 

Microaspiration of subglottic secretions is the main pathogenic mechanism for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Adequate inflation of the endotracheal cuff is pivotal to providing an optimal seal of the extraluminal airway. However, cuff pressure substantially fluctuates due to patient or tube movements, which can induce microaspiration. Therefore, devices for continuous cuff pressure control (CCPC) have been developed in recent years. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of CCPC in VAP prevention.

DATA SOURCES: 

A systematic search of Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was conducted up to February 2022.

STUDY SELECTION: 

Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing the impact of CCPC versus intermittent cuff pressure control on the occurrence of VAP.

DATA EXTRACTION: 

Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for VAP incidence between groups. Secondary outcome measures included mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and ICU stay. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

DATA SYNTHESIS: 

Eleven RCTs with 2,092 adult intubated patients were included. The use of CCPC was associated with a reduced risk of VAP (OR, 0.51). Meta-analyses of secondary endpoints showed no significant difference in mortality but significant differences in durations of MV (mean difference, –1.07 d) and ICU stay (mean difference, –3.41 d) in favor of CCPC. However, the risk of both reporting and individual study bias was considered important. The main issues were the lack of blinding, potential commercial conflicts of interest of study authors and high heterogeneity due to methodological differences between studies, differences in devices used for CCPC and in applied baseline preventive measures. Certainty of the evidence was considered “very low.”

CONCLUSIONS: 

The use of CCPC was associated with a reduction in VAP incidence; however, this was based on very low certainty of evidence due to concerns related to risk of bias and inconsistency.