Other bulletins in this series include:

Breast Surgery

Showing posts with label Post-intensive care syndrome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Post-intensive care syndrome. Show all posts

Tuesday, 14 October 2025

 

Post-intensive care unit clinics: models and implementation - a systematic review

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 421 (2025) Published: 06 October 2025

Background

Advances in critical care have shifted the focus from survival alone to addressing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS), which includes persistent physical, cognitive, and psychological challenges after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). While post-ICU clinics have been established in high-income countries (HICs), their adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited, with structured follow-up care still under development.

Objective

To systematically review models of post-ICU clinics, examine barriers and facilitators to their implementation, and explore their potential applicability in LMICs.

Methods

This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024536147) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and CINAHL was completed on April 24, 2024. Studies published after 2000 describing adult post-ICU clinic models addressing PICS were included. Nineteen studies—comprising randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and quasi-experimental designs—met inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Thematic synthesis was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results

Three primary models emerged: (1) hospital-based physical interviews (2), hybrid models incorporating both in-person and telehealth consultations, and (3) fully remote models using telehealth or home visits. Telehealth/home-visit models reported the highest mean attendance (88.7%), followed by hybrid (59%) and physical interview models (51.9%). Common barriers included resource constraints, transportation difficulties, limited awareness, inadequate insurance coverage, and poor interdisciplinary coordination. Facilitators included flexible scheduling, early stakeholder engagement, multidisciplinary team involvement, and use of telehealth technologies. While hybrid models appeared promising for LMICs due to their balance of accessibility and comprehensiveness, the evidence for clinical outcome benefit remains inconclusive, and questions about cost-effectiveness and sustainability persist.

Conclusion

Hybrid post-ICU clinic models may offer a feasible pathway for improving follow-up care in LMICs, especially when tailored to local constraints. However, their implementation must consider significant barriers, particularly related to funding and infrastructure, and be guided by emerging but still limited evidence on long-term patient outcomes. These findings aim to inform cautious, context-specific development of post-ICU care strategies in resource-limited settings.

 

Determinants of ICU memories and the impact on the development and trajectory of post-traumatic stress symptoms: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study

Intensive Care Medicine Published: 06 October 2025

 Purpose

To identify demographic and clinical determinants of memory formation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and determine the relationship between ICU memories and the development and trajectory of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.

Methods

Adult patients (n=426) from two Dutch University ICUs underwent a structured telephone interview using the validated ICU-Memory Tool (ICU-MT) 3 months post-ICU and were assessed for symptoms of PTSD using the Impact of Event Scale (IES-6) at 3 and 12 months post-ICU.

Results

Factual memories without delusional memories were present in 47.7% (n=203), complete ICU amnesia in 13.8% (n=59), and delusional memories in 38.5% (n=164) of patients. Delirium was present in 41% (n=68) of patients with delusional memories. Using multinomial logistic regression, female sex and number of days with deep sedation were associated with ICU amnesia (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.043.81, and aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.091.65, respectively), whereas delirium and length of ICU stay were associated with delusional memories (aOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.043.61, and aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.021.21, respectively). Of 250 patients assessed at both time points, the prevalence of PTSD symptoms increased significantly over time (4.5 to 10.0%, p<0.01), driven by a significant increase among those with delusional memories (6.7 to 18.1%, p<0.01). In a linear mixed-effects model, delusional memories were independently linked to both 3- and 12-month symptoms of PTSD (vs. factuals, adjusted %-difference in mean IES score, 12.9%, 95% CI 2.624.1%, and 18.1%, 95% CI 5.232.5%, respectively).

Conclusions

Female sex and prolonged deep sedation were associated with complete ICU amnesia, whereas a longer ICU stay and delirium were associated with delusional memories, although these memories were also common in those without delirium. Delusional memories were independently linked to the development and persistence of PTSD symptoms. Targeted interventions to mitigate memory disturbances, both during and after the ICU, may help alleviate the psychological impact of critical illness.

 

Thursday, 22 May 2025

 

Depression or anxiety and long-term mortality among adult survivors of intensive care unit: a population-based cohort study

Critical Care volume 29, Article number: 179 (2025) Published: 06 May 2025

Background

Many patients who survive intensive care unit (ICU) stays experience persistent mental impairments. It is estimated that one-third of ICU survivors suffer from psychiatric disorders. However, research into how these disorders affect long-term outcomes in this population is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the association between depression or anxiety and long-term mortality among ICU survivors.

Methods

This population-based cohort study included patients admitted to the ICU between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019, who survived at least 1 year after ICU discharge. Exclusions were made for patients admitted for non-medical reasons and those who had been in the ICU in the previous 2 years, and 799,645 patients were included in the study. Follow-up data were obtained for up to 7 years. The primary outcome was long-term cumulative mortality. Mortality rates for patients with and without diagnoses of depression or anxiety were compared.

Results

Of the 799,645 adult ICU survivors, 98,530 (12.3%) were newly diagnosed with depression or anxiety post-discharge, and 265,092 (33.2%) had been diagnosed prior to ICU admission. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for long-term mortality was 1.17 (95% CI, 1.16–1.19) for those newly diagnosed with depression or anxiety, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.26–1.30) for depression alone, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06–1.11) for anxiety alone. For those with prior diagnoses, the adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.07–1.09) overall, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.11–1.14) for depression, and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.03–1.05) for anxiety.

Conclusions

ICU survivors newly diagnosed with depression or anxiety exhibit higher long-term mortality rates compared to those without such diagnoses, including those diagnosed before ICU admission. Particularly, newly diagnosed depression is associated with an elevated mortality rate. These findings underscore the need for psychological interventions to enhance long-term survival among ICU survivors.

 

Tuesday, 19 March 2024

 

Improving management of ARDS: uniting acute management and long-term recovery

 

by Nicola Latronico, M. Eikermann, E. W. Ely and D. M. Needham 

 

Critical Care volume 28, Article number: 58 (2024) Published: 23 February 2024

 

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is an important global health issue with high in-hospital mortality. Importantly, the impact of ARDS extends beyond the acute phase, with increased mortality and disability for months to years after hospitalization. These findings underscore the importance of extended follow-up to assess and address the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS), characterized by persistent impairments in physical, cognitive, and/or mental health status that impair quality of life over the long-term. Persistent muscle weakness is a common physical problem for ARDS survivors, affecting mobility and activities of daily living. Critical illness and related interventions, including prolonged bed rest and overuse of sedatives and neuromuscular blocking agents during mechanical ventilation, are important risk factors for ICU-acquired weakness. Deep sedation also increases the risk of delirium in the ICU, and long-term cognitive impairment. Corticosteroids also may be used during management of ARDS, particularly in the setting of COVID-19. Corticosteroids can be associated with myopathy and muscle weakness, as well as prolonged delirium that increases the risk of long-term cognitive impairment. The optimal duration and dosage of corticosteroids remain uncertain, and there's limited long-term data on their effects on muscle weakness and cognition in ARDS survivors. In addition to physical and cognitive issues, mental health challenges, such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, are common in ARDS survivors. Strategies to address these complications emphasize the need for consistent implementation of the evidence-based ABCDEF bundle, which includes daily management of analgesia in concert with early cessation of sedatives, avoidance of benzodiazepines, daily delirium monitoring and management, early mobilization, and incorporation of family at the bedside. In conclusion, ARDS is a complex global health challenge with consequences extending beyond the acute phase. Understanding the links between critical care management and long-term consequences is vital for developing effective therapeutic strategies and improving the quality of life for ARDS survivors.

Wednesday, 13 September 2023

 

Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine

 

Intensive Care Medicine: Narrative Review: Published: 07 September 2023

 

 

Abstract

Despite significant advancements in critical care medicine, limited attention has been given to sex and gender disparities in management and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). While “sex” pertains to biological and physiological characteristics, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes and sex hormones, “gender” refers more to sociocultural roles and human behavior. Unfortunately, data on gender-related topics in the ICU are lacking. Consequently, data on sex and gender-related differences in admission to the ICU, clinical course, length of stay, mortality, and post-ICU burdens, are often inconsistent. Moreover, when examining specific diagnoses in the ICU, variations can be observed in epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, severity, and treatment response due to the distinct impact of sex hormones on the immune and cardiovascular systems. In this narrative review, we highlight the influence of sex and gender on the clinical course, management, and outcomes of the most encountered intensive care conditions, in addition to the potential co-existence of unconscious biases which may also impact critical illness. Diagnoses with a known sex predilection will be discussed within the context of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where clinical improvement is needed. To optimize patient care and outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend and address sex and gender differences in the ICU setting and personalize management accordingly to ensure equitable, patient-centered care. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving sex and gender disparities, as well as exploring targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities and improve outcomes for all critically ill patients.