Upper gastrointestinal bleeding on veno-arterial extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation support
by Quentin de Roux,
Yekcan Disli, Wulfran Bougouin, Marie Renaudier, Ali Jendoubi, Jean-Claude
Merle, Mathilde Delage, Lucile Picard, Faiza Sayagh, Chamsedine Cherait,
Thierry Folliguet, Christophe Quesnel, Aymeric Becq and Nicolas Mongardon
Annals of
Intensive Care volume 14, Article number: 104, Published: 03
July 2024
Introduction
Patients on
veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support are at a
high risk of hemorrhagic complications, including upper gastrointestinal
bleeding (UGIB). The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and
impact of this complication in V-A ECMO patients.
Materials and
methods
A retrospective
single-center study (2013–2017) was conducted on V-A ECMO patients, excluding
those who died within 24 h. All patients with suspected UGIB underwent
esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and were analyzed and compared to the
remainder of the cohort, from the initiation of ECMO until 5 days after
explantation.
Results
A total of
150 V-A ECMO cases (65 after cardiac surgery and 85 due to medical
etiology) were included. 90% of the patients received prophylactic proton pump
inhibitor therapy and enteral nutrition. Thirty-one patients underwent EGD for
suspected UGIB, with 16 confirmed cases of UGIB. The incidence was 10.7%, with
a median occurrence at 10 [7–17] days. There were no significant differences in
clinical or biological characteristics on the day of EGD. However, patients
with UGIB had significant increases in packed red blood cells and fresh frozen
plasma needs, mechanical ventilation duration and V-A ECMO duration, as well as
in length of intensive care unit and hospital stays. There was no significant
difference in mortality. The only independent risk factor of UGIB was a history
of peptic ulcer (OR = 7.32; 95% CI [1.07–50.01], p = 0.042).
Conclusion
UGIB occurred in at
least 1 out of 10 cases of V-A ECMO patients, with significant consequences on
healthcare resources. Enteral nutrition and proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis
did not appear to protect V-A ECMO patients. Further studies should assess their
real benefits in these patients with high risk of hemorrhage.
No comments:
Post a Comment