by Julien Vaidie,
Edwige Peju, Louise-Marie Jandeaux, Mathieu Lesouhaitier, Jean-Claude
Lacherade, Antoine Guillon, Xavier Wittebole, Pierre Asfar, Bruno Evrard,
Thomas Daix, Philippe Vignon and Bruno François
Critical Care volume 27,
Article number: 340 (2023)
Background
Except in a few retrospective studies mainly including
patients under chemotherapy, information regarding the impact of
immunosuppressive therapy on the prognosis of patients admitted to the
intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock is scarce. Accordingly, the PACIFIC
study aimed to asses if immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an
increased mortality in patients admitted to the ICU for septic shock.
Methods
This was a retrospective epidemiological multicentre study.
Eight high enroller centres in septic shock randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
participated in the study. Patients in the “exposed” group were selected from
the screen failure logs of seven recent RCTs and excluded because of
immunosuppressive treatment. The “non-exposed” patients were those included in
the placebo arm of the same RCTs. A multivariate logistic regression model was
used to estimate the risk of death.
Results
Among the 433 patients enrolled, 103 were included in the
“exposed” group and 330 in the “non-exposed” group. Reason for
immunosuppressive therapy included organ transplantation (n = 45 [44%]) or
systemic disease (n = 58 [56%]). ICU mortality rate was 24% in the “exposed”
group and 25% in the “non-exposed” group (p = 0.9). Neither in univariate nor
in multivariate analysis immunosuppressive therapy was associated with a higher
ICU mortality (OR: 0.95; [95% CI 0.56–1.58]: p = 0.86 and 1.13 [95% CI
0.61–2.05]: p = 0.69, respectively) or 3-month mortality (OR: 1.13; [95%
CI 0.69–1.82]: p = 0.62 and OR: 1.36 [95% CI 0.78–2.37]: p = 0.28,
respectively).
Conclusions
In this study, long-term immunosuppressive therapy excluding
chemotherapy was not associated with significantly higher or lower ICU and
3-month mortality in patients admitted to the ICU for septic shock.
No comments:
Post a Comment