Discriminating between CPAP success and failure in COVID-19 patients with
severe respiratory failure
By: Pietro Arina, Beatrice Baso, Valeria Moro, Hemani Patel, Gareth Ambler on behalf of the UCL Critical Care COVID-19 Research
Group
Intensive Care Medicine (2020)
Published: 16
November 2020
Research letter
Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) treatment was
used increasingly in the UK and elsewhere for coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) to avoid the need for mechanical ventilation [1,2,3].
Early identification of patients benefitting from CPAP would assist decision
making however we found that intensive care unit (ICU) admission respiratory
parameters (rate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio) were poorly discriminatory. Using
electronic healthcare records we retrospectively studied COVID-19 patients
admitted to the University College London Hospital ICU between 8 March and 5
June 2020 in moderate-to-severe respiratory failure who received initial
management with CPAP to see whether better prognosticators could be identified.
Comparison of demographic, clinical and biochemical
parameters measured on ICU admission was made between patients adjudged CPAP
success (hospital survival with CPAP alone) or failure (either death where CPAP
was a ceiling of treatment, or need for mechanical ventilation regardless of
hospital outcome). Requirement for other organ support was also compared.
Patients managed on CPAP in non-ICU wards were excluded as detailed clinical
and lab data were often lacking.
Of 108 within-hospital admissions, 93 (86%) received
CPAP as initial respiratory failure management (median[IQR] PaO2/FiO2 ratio
13 [10–18] kPa) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Thirty-two (34%) were adjudged CPAP
successes and 61 (66%) failures (14 deaths (23%) with CPAP as the ceiling of
treatment, 47 (77%) requiring invasive ventilation of whom 26 died).
Demographics and ICU admission values of respiratory rate, inspired oxygen
concentration (FiO2) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were similar between groups
(Supplementary data). Admission values of C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.0001),
N Terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (p < 0.001),
troponin-T (p < 0.001) and D-dimers (p < 0.05) were significantly
higher in CPAP failure patients (Fig. 1).
Other organ support was only required for CPAP failure patients receiving
invasive ventilation (46 vasopressors, 28 renal replacement therapy), but
none for CPAP successes. At 6 h post-CPAP the PaO2/FiO2 ratio rose by
76.7% (37.9 to 99.8%) in CPAP success patients but only by 38.1%
(−24.4 to 100.5) in the failure group (p = 0.015)…
1 comment:
Click link for full letter
Post a Comment