Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Use in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Critical Care Medicine
Weiss CHet al
Objective: Low tidal volume ventilation lowers mortality in the acute
respiratory distress syndrome. Previous studies reported poor low tidal
volume ventilation implementation. We sought to determine the rate,
quality, and predictors of low tidal volume ventilation use.
Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Setting: One academic and three community hospitals in the Chicago
region.
Patients: A total of 362 adults meeting the Berlin Definition of acute
respiratory distress syndrome consecutively admitted between June and
December 2013.
Measurements and Main Results: Seventy patients (19.3%) were treated
with low tidal volume ventilation (tidal volume < 6.5 mL/kg predicted
body weight) at some time during mechanical ventilation. In total,
22.2% of patients requiring an FIO2 greater than 40% and 37.3% of
patients with FIO2 greater than 40% and plateau pressure greater than
30 cm H2O received low tidal volume ventilation. The entire cohort
received low tidal volume ventilation 11.4% of the time patients had
acute respiratory distress syndrome. Among patients who received low
tidal volume ventilation, the mean (SD) percentage of acute respiratory
distress syndrome time it was used was 59.1% (38.2%), and 34% waited
more than 72 hours prior to low tidal volume ventilation initiation.
Women were less likely to receive low tidal volume ventilation, whereas
sepsis and FIO2 greater than 40% were associated with increased odds of
low tidal volume ventilation use. Four attending physicians (6.2%)
initiated low tidal volume ventilation within 1 day of acute respiratory
distress syndrome onset for greater than or equal to 50% of their
patients, whereas 34 physicians (52.3%) never initiated low tidal volume
ventilation within 1 day of acute respiratory distress syndrome onset.
In total, 54.4% of patients received a tidal volume less than 8 mL/kg
predicted body weight, and the mean tidal volume during the first 72
hours after acute respiratory distress syndrome onset was never less
than 8 mL/kg predicted body weight.
Conclusions: More than 12 years after publication of the landmark low
tidal volume ventilation study, use remains poor. Interventions that
improve adoption of low tidal volume ventilation are needed.
No comments:
Post a Comment