Intensive Care Medicine: Published: 27 April 2026
Abstract
Despite invasive methods are the gold standard for
intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement, several non-invasive techniques (nICP)
have been proposed as surrogate, although their use remains insufficiently
recognized in clinical practice. These include transcranial Doppler blood flow
velocity assessment (arterial or venous), optic nerve sheath diameter
(ONSD), automated pupillometry, measurement of skull expansion and compliance,
brain imaging, double-depth ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity, and ultrasound
time-of-flight. The main limitations of all indirect methods are calibration
and zeroing, which constrain the absolute accuracy of non-invasive ICP
monitoring. For transcranial Doppler-based methods, the 95% limits of agreement
are approximately ± 7–15 mmHg, while for ONSD-based
techniques they range from ± 7–10 mmHg. Improved predictive
accuracy may be achieved by combining different modalities and applying
advanced signal analysis techniques. Importantly, in patients with acute brain
injury, nICP can complement invasive monitoring by guiding patient selection for
urgent monitoring, facilitating brain assessment in moderate traumatic brain
injury, and assisting management in patients with coagulopathy. In the general
intensive care population, nICP may provide valuable information after cardiac
arrest, liver failure, and sepsis. In the emergency department, early detection
of intracranial hypertension helps prevent missing the “golden hour” of brain
care. Finally, nICP is particularly relevant in low-resource settings, where
intensive care facilities are limited.
No comments:
Post a Comment