Mark E. Haaksma, Jasper M. Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre
Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C. Goligher, Leo
Heunks, Endry H. T. Lim, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi,
Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier
Critical Care volume 26, Published: 08
April 2022
Background
Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both
critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on
its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist.
Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal
measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for
research.
Methods
To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between
November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based
Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature
review, the following domains were chosen: “Anatomy and physiology”,
“Transducer Settings”, “Ventilator Impact”, “Learning and expertise”, “Daily
practice” and “Future directions”. Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was
needed to reach consensus on a question.
Results
Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the
survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42
questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions
aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both
rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on
measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease
in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum
training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition,
key areas for research were established.
Conclusion
This expert consensus statement presents the first set of
consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve
to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice
and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby
key areas for research are established.
No comments:
Post a Comment