Distribution of delirium motor subtypes in the intensive
care unit: a systematic scoping review
by Kirstine N. la Cour, Nina C. Andersen-Ranberg, Sarah
Weihe, Lone M. Poulsen, Camilla B. Mortensen, Cilia K. W. Kjer, Marie O.
Collet, Stine Estrup and Ole Mathiesen
Critical Care volume 26,
Article number: 53 (2022) Published: 03
March 2022
Background
Delirium is the most common cerebral dysfunction in the
intensive care unit (ICU) and can be subdivided into a hypoactive, hyperactive,
or mixed motor subtype based on the clinical manifestation. The aim of this
review was to describe the distribution, pharmacological interventions, and
outcomes of delirium motor subtypes in ICU patients.
Methods
This systematic scoping review was performed according to
the PRISMA-ScR and Cochrane guidelines. We performed a systematic search in six
major databases to identify relevant studies. A meta-regression analysis was
performed where pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were computed by
a random effect model.
Results
We included 131 studies comprising 13,902 delirious
patients. There was a large between-study heterogeneity among studies,
including differences in study design, setting, population, and outcome
reporting. Hypoactive delirium was the most prevalent delirium motor subtype
(50.3% [95% CI 46.0–54.7]), followed by mixed delirium (27.7% [95% CI 24.1–31.3])
and hyperactive delirium (22.7% [95% CI 19.0–26.5]). When comparing the
delirium motor subtypes, patients with mixed delirium experienced the longest
delirium duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, the highest ICU and
hospital mortality, and more frequently received administration of specific
agents (antipsychotics, α2-agonists, benzodiazepines, and propofol) during ICU
stay. In studies with high average age for delirious patients (> 65 years),
patients were more likely to experience hypoactive delirium.
Conclusions
Hypoactive delirium was the most prevalent motor subtype in
critically ill patients. Mixed delirium had the worst outcomes in terms of
delirium duration, length of stay, and mortality, and received more
pharmacological interventions compared to other delirium motor subtypes. Few
studies contributed to secondary outcomes; hence, these results should be
interpreted with care. The large between-study heterogeneity suggests that a
more standardized methodology in delirium research is warranted.
No comments:
Post a Comment