by Mariana Luz, Bruna Brandão Barreto, Roberta Esteves
Vieira de Castro, Jorge Salluh, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Caio Araujo, Audrey De Jong,
Gérald Chanques, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Eduardo Tobar, Carolina Gimenez-Esparza
Vich, Federico Carini, Eugene Wesley Ely, Joanna L. Stollings, Kelly Drumright,
John Kress…
Annals of
Intensive Care volume 12,
Article number: 9 (2022)
Background
Since the publication of the 2018 Clinical Guidelines about
sedation, analgesia, delirium, mobilization, and sleep deprivation in
critically ill patients, no evaluation and adequacy assessment of these
recommendations were studied in an international context. This survey aimed to
investigate these current practices and if the COVID-19 pandemic has changed
them.
Methods
This study was an open multinational electronic survey
directed to physicians working in adult intensive care units (ICUs), which was
performed in two steps: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results
We analyzed 1768 questionnaires and 1539 (87%) were
complete. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we received 1476 questionnaires and 292
were submitted later. The following practices were observed before the
pandemic: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (61.5%), the Behavioral Pain Scale
(BPS) (48.2%), the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (76.6%), and the
Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) (66.6%) were
the most frequently tools used to assess pain, sedation level, and delirium, respectively;
midazolam and fentanyl were the most frequently used drugs for inducing
sedation and analgesia (84.8% and 78.3%, respectively), whereas haloperidol
(68.8%) and atypical antipsychotics (69.4%) were the most prescribed drugs for
delirium treatment; some physicians regularly prescribed drugs to induce sleep
(19.1%) or ordered mechanical restraints as part of their routine (6.2%) for
patients on mechanical ventilation; non-pharmacological strategies were
frequently applied for pain, delirium, and sleep deprivation management. During
the COVID-19 pandemic, the intensive care specialty was independently
associated with best practices. Moreover, the mechanical ventilation rate was
higher, patients received sedation more often (94% versus 86.1%, p < 0.001)
and sedation goals were discussed more frequently in daily rounds. Morphine was
the main drug used for analgesia (77.2%), and some sedative drugs, such as
midazolam, propofol, ketamine and quetiapine, were used more frequently.
Conclusions
Most sedation, analgesia and delirium practices were
comparable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the
intensive care specialty was a variable that was independently associated with
the best practices. Although many findings are in accordance with
evidence-based recommendations, some practices still need improvement.
No comments:
Post a Comment