by Azad, Tej D.; Al-Kawaz, Mais N.; Turnbull, Alison E.;
Rivera-Lara, Lucia
Critical Care Medicine: October 2021
- Volume 49 - Issue 10 - p e1037-e1039
OBJECTIVES:
To determine if a restrictive visitor policy inadvertently
lengthened the decision-making process for dying inpatients without coronavirus
disease 2019.
DESIGN:
Regression discontinuity and time-to-event analysis.
SETTING:
Two large academic hospitals in a unified health system.
PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS:
Adult decedents who received greater than or equal to 1 day
of ICU care during their terminal admission over a 12-month period.
INTERVENTIONS:
Implementation of a visit restriction policy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
We identified 940 adult decedents without coronavirus
disease 2019 during the study period. For these patients, ICU length of stay
was 0.8 days longer following policy implementation, although this effect was
not statistically significant (95% CI, –2.3 to 3.8; p = 0.63). After
excluding patients admitted before the policy but who died after
implementation, we observed that ICU length of stay was 2.9 days longer
post-policy (95% CI, 0.27–5.6; p = 0.03). A time-to-event analysis
revealed that admission after policy implementation was associated with a
significantly longer time to first do not resuscitate/do not intubate/comfort
care order (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6–3.1; p <
0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS:
Policies restricting family presence may lead to longer ICU
stays and delay decisions to limit treatment prior to death. Further policy
evaluation and programs enabling access to family-centered care and palliative
care during the ongoing
coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are imperative.
No comments:
Post a Comment