by Fabio Silvio Taccone, Jacob Hollenberg, Sune Forsberg,
Anatolij Truhlar, Martin Jonsson, Filippo Annoni, Dan Gryth, Mattias Ringh,
Jerome Cuny, Hans-Jörg Busch, Jean-Louis Vincent, Leif Svensson and Per Nordberg
Critical Care volume 25,
Article number: 198 (2021)
Background
Randomized trials have shown that trans-nasal evaporative
cooling initiated during CPR (i.e. intra-arrest) effectively lower core body
temperature in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. However, these trials
may have been underpowered to detect significant differences in neurologic
outcome, especially in patients with initial shockable rhythm.
Methods
We conducted a post hoc pooled analysis of individual data
from two randomized trials including 851 patients who eventually received the
allocated intervention and with available outcome (“as-treated” analysis).
Primary outcome was survival with favourable neurological outcome at hospital
discharge (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] of 1–2) according to the initial
rhythm (shockable vs. non-shockable). Secondary outcomes included complete
neurological recovery (CPC 1) at hospital discharge.
Results
Among the 325 patients with initial shockable rhythms,
favourable neurological outcome was observed in 54/158 (34.2%) patients in the
intervention and 40/167 (24.0%) in the control group (RR 1.43 [confidence
intervals, CIs 1.01–2.02]). Complete neurological recovery was observed in
40/158 (25.3%) in the intervention and 27/167 (16.2%) in the control group (RR
1.57 [CIs 1.01–2.42]). Among the 526 patients with initial non-shockable
rhythms, favourable neurological outcome was in 10/259 (3.8%) in the
intervention and 13/267 (4.9%) in the control group (RR 0.88 [CIs
0.52–1.29]; p = 0.67); survival and complete neurological recovery were
also similar between groups. No significant benefit was observed for the
intervention in the entire population.
Conclusions
In this pooled analysis of individual data, intra-arrest
cooling was associated with a significant increase in favourable neurological
outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial shockable
rhythms. Future studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of this
intervention in this subgroup of patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment