by David Leasa, Paul Cameron, Kimia Honarmand, Tina Mele and
Karen J. Bosma
Critical Care volume 25,
Article number: 22 (2021)
Providing optimal care to patients with acute respiratory
illness while preventing hospital transmission of COVID-19 is of paramount
importance during the pandemic; the challenge lies in achieving both goals
simultaneously. Controversy exists regarding the role of early intubation
versus use of non-invasive respiratory support measures to avoid intubation.
This review summarizes available evidence and provides a clinical decision
algorithm with risk mitigation techniques to guide clinicians in care of the hypoxemic,
non-intubated, patient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although aerosolization of
droplets may occur with aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMP), including
high flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, the risk of using these
AGMP is outweighed by the benefit in carefully selected patients, particularly
if care is taken to mitigate risk of viral transmission. Non-invasive support
measures should not be denied for conditions where previously proven effective
and may be used even while there is suspicion of COVID-19 infection. Patients
with de novo acute respiratory illness with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 may
also benefit. These techniques may improve oxygenation sufficiently to allow
some patients to avoid intubation; however, patients must be carefully
monitored for signs of increased work of breathing. Patients showing signs of
clinical deterioration or high work of breathing not alleviated by non-invasive
support should proceed promptly to intubation and invasive lung protective ventilation
strategy. With adherence to these principles, risk of viral spread can be
minimized.
No comments:
Post a Comment