by Cable,
Casey A.; Razavi, Seyed Amirhossein; Roback, John D.; Murphy, David J.
Objectives: To critically assess available high-level clinical studies regarding
RBC transfusion strategies, with a focus on hemoglobin transfusion thresholds
in the ICU.
Data Sources: Source data were obtained from a PubMed
literature review.
Study Selection: English language studies addressing RBC
transfusions in the ICU with a focus on the most recent relevant studies.
Data Extraction: Relevant studies were reviewed and the
following aspects of each study were identified, abstracted, and analyzed:
study design, methods, results, and implications for critical care practice.
Data Synthesis: Approximately 30–50% of ICU patients receive
a transfusion during their hospitalization with anemia being the indication for
75% of transfusions. A significant body of clinical research evidence supports
using a restrictive transfusion strategy (e.g., hemoglobin threshold <
7 g/dL) compared with a more liberal approach (e.g., hemoglobin threshold <
10 g/dL). A restrictive strategy (hemoglobin < 7 g/dL) is recommended in patients
with sepsis and gastrointestinal bleeds. A slightly higher restrictive
threshold is recommended in cardiac surgery (hemoglobin < 7.5 g/dL) and
stable cardiovascular disease (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL). Although restrictive
strategies are generally supported in hematologic malignancies, acute
neurologic injury, and burns, more definitive studies are needed, including
acute coronary syndrome. Massive transfusion protocols are the mainstay of
treatment for hemorrhagic shock; however, the exact RBC to fresh frozen plasma
ratio is still unclear. There are also emerging complimentary practices
including nontransfusion strategies to avoid and treat anemia and the
reemergence of whole blood transfusion.
Conclusions: The current literature supports the use of
restrictive transfusion strategies in the majority of critically ill
populations. Continued studies of optimal transfusion strategies in various
patient populations, coupled with the integration of novel complementary ICU
practices, will continue to enhance our ability to treat critically ill
patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment