A monthly current awareness service for NHS Critical Care staff, produced by the Library & Knowledge Service at East Cheshire NHS Trust.
Thursday, 7 April 2016
Impact of Initial Central Venous Pressure on Outcomes of Conservative Versus Liberal Fluid Management in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Impact of Initial Central Venous Pressure on Outcomes of
Conservative Versus Liberal Fluid Management in Acute Respiratory Distress
Syndrome
Critical Care Medicine: April 2016 -
Volume 44 - Issue 4 - p 782–789
Semler, M et al
Objectives: In acute respiratory distress syndrome,
conservative fluid management increases ventilator-free days without affecting
mortality. Response to fluid management may differ based on patients’ initial
central venous pressure. We hypothesized that initial central venous pressure
would modify the effect of fluid management on outcomes. Design: Retrospective
analysis of the Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial, a multicenter randomized
trial comparing conservative with liberal fluid management in acute respiratory
distress syndrome. We examined the relationship between initial central venous
pressure, fluid strategy, and 60-day mortality in univariate and multivariable
analysis. Setting: Twenty acute care hospitals. Patients: Nine hundred
thirty-four ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with a
central venous pressure available at enrollment, 609 without baseline shock
(for whom fluid balance was managed by the study protocol). Interventions:
None. Measurements and Main Results: Among patients without baseline shock,
those with initial central venous pressure greater than 8 mm Hg experienced
similar mortality with conservative and liberal fluid management (18% vs 18%; p
= 0.928), whereas those with central venous pressure of 8 mm Hg or less
experienced lower mortality with a conservative strategy (17% vs 36%; p =
0.005). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an interaction between initial
central venous pressure and the effect of fluid strategy on mortality (p =
0.031). At higher initial central venous pressures, the difference in treatment
between arms was predominantly furosemide administration, which was not
associated with mortality (p = 0.122). At lower initial central venous
pressures, the difference between arms was predominantly fluid administration,
with additional fluid associated with increased mortality (p = 0.013).
Conclusions: Conservative fluid management decreases mortality for acute
respiratory distress syndrome patients with a low initial central venous
pressure. In this population, the administration of IV fluids seems to increase
mortality.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment