Subsequent shock deliveries are associated with increased favorable neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms
Critical
Care 2015, 19:322
Kitamura,
N et al
Introduction:
Previous studies evaluating whether subsequent conversion to shockable rhythms
in patients who had initially non-shockable rhythms was associated with altered
clinical outcome reported inconsistent results. Therefore, we hypothesized that
subsequent shock delivery by emergency medical service (EMS) providers altered
clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable rhythms.
Methods: We tested for an association between subsequent shock delivery in EMS
resuscitation and clinical outcomes in patients with initially non-shockable
rhythms (n = 11,481) through a survey of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest in the Kanto region (SOS-KANTO) 2012 study cohort, Japan. The primary
investigated outcome was 1-month survival with favorable neurological
functions. The secondary outcome variable was the presence of subsequent shock
delivery. We further evaluated the association of interval from initiation of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation to shock with clinical outcomes. Results: In the
univariate analysis of initially non-shockable rhythms, patients who received
subsequent shock delivery had significantly increased frequency of return of
spontaneous circulation, 24-hour survival, 1-month survival, and favorable
neurological outcomes compared to the subsequent not shocked group (P
<0 .0001="" 1-month="" 1.45="" 2.78="" 95="" activity="" adjusted="" age="" analysis="" and="" arrest="" associated="" by="" cardiac="" conclusions:="" confidence="" defibrillation="" early="" electrical="" ems="" etiology="" favorable="" had="" in="" increased="" initial="" initially="" interval="" logistic="" multivariate="" neurological="" non-shockable="" not="" o:p="" odds="" of="" outcomes.="" outcomes="" p="0.0020," patients="" presence="" providers="" pulseless="" ratio="" received="" regression="" rhythms.="" rhythms="" shock="" shocked="" significantly="" study="" subsequent="" the="" this="" vs.="" was="" were="" who="" with="" witnessed="" younger="">0>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.